Posts tagged Church History
SRR 124 WLC: Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God and man in one person?

A Baptist study on the Westminster Larger Catechism, Question 40, held at the Old Paths Christian Church on 6 January 2020. Topics include Christology and the Trinity; ancient creeds and councils; Nestorianism and other ancient heresies; Greek philosophy, essentialism, realism, metaphysics and existence; Roman Catholic teaching; the problem of the one and the many; and more!

Q. 40. Why was it requisite that the Mediator should be God and man in one person? 

A. It was requisite that the Mediator, who was to reconcile God and man, should himself be both God and man, and this in one person, that the proper works of each nature might be accepted of God for us,t and relied on by us, as the works of the whole person.u

(t) Matt 1:21,23; Matt 3:17; Heb 9:14
(u) 1 Pet 2:6

Resources

+https://www.chapellibrary.org/book/lbcw/the-london-baptist-confession-of-faith-of-1689-with-preface-baptist-catechism-and-appendix-on-baptism

+https://reformedbrotherhood.com/trb-113-nestorianism/

“Human nature, therefore, although endowed with intelligence and will, may be, and in fact is, in the person of Christ impersonal. That it is so is the plain doctrine of Scripture, for the Son of God, a divine person, assumed a perfect human nature, and, nevertheless, remains one person.” (Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/hodge/theology2.html)

+Bruce Shelley, Church History in Plain Language, Fourth Edition Zondervan Academic, https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GCG55EM/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_awdb_t1_x_V8cfEbQNFNPY7

+J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines: Revised Edition, https://www.amazon.com/dp/006064334X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_YBnNEbZ1WRQ8W

Roger Olson, The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition & Reform, https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/372001517

+The Distinctiveness of Baptist Covenant Theology: A Comparison Between Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist and Paedobaptist Federalism [Revised Edition] by Pascal Denault, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23827777

+Gordon H. Clark, “Atheism,” http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=50

+Gordon H. Clark, The Trinity, http://www.trinitylectures.org/trinity-the-p-78.html; and The Incarnation, http://www.trinitylectures.org/incarnation-the-p-92.html

SRR 121 Deranged by Doug Wilson, Messianic Judaism & John Piper & the Decline of Sola Fide at Final Judgment (7)
SRR 118 Don't Talk About Politics or Religion

One of our main cultural taboos is, “Don’t talk about politics or religion,” but the Christian just can’t seem to keep his mouth shut. Join us for the last episode of the decade as Tim Shaughnessy opens up about personal issues and the challenges of sharing your faith with loved ones who don’t want to hear it.

This episode is also brought to you by The Trinity Foundation and we would like to thank Tom Juodaitis for allowing us to publish this Sermon from the late Dr. Richard Bennett titled, “Justification and The Roman Catholic Doctrine of Salvation.”

We would also like to recommend the ministry founded by Dr. Bennett, Berean Beacon.

Are Roman Catholics Saved?

SRR 115 The Resurrection: John Piper & the Decline of Sola Fide at Final Judgment (6)
SRR 92 Brandon Adams on Covenant Theology & Republication, Part I

Carlos and Tim interview Brandon Adams from 1689federalism.com on Covenant Theology; differences between Presbyterian, Reformed Baptist, and New Covenant Theology; Republication and Westminster West vs Westminster East; Law and Gospel; and more!

ThornCrownMinistries.com

 

References

  1. http://www.1689federalism.com/from-shadow-to-substance/
  2. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/murray-on-lev-185-why-did-john-murray-reject-the-covenant-of-works/
  3. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2018/08/24/notes-on-a-podcast-discussion-with-patrick-hines-on-covenant-theology-baptism/
  4. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2018/08/30/acceptable-understanding-of-mosaic-law-according-to-the-opc-report-on-republication/
  5. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/opc-report-on-republication-background/
  6. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/07/25/guy-waters-on-leviticus-185/
  7. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/piper-vs-owen-on-romans-26-7-13/
  8. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/is-john-piper-confessional/
  9. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/nehemiah-coxe-on-merit-in-lbcf-7-1/
  10. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/1689-federalism-americas-founding/
  11. http://www.1689federalism.com/republication-the-mosaic-covenant-and-eternal-life/
  12. http://www.1689federalism.com/1689-federalism-theonomy/
  13. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/05/17/calvin-vs-1689-federalism-on-old-vs-new/
  14. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/can-r-scott-clark-be-truly-reformed/
  15. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/neonomian-presbyterians-vs-antinomian-congregationalists/
  16. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/summary-of-venemas-review-of-tlnf/
  17. “In Defense of Moses” and Venema’s review https://sites.google.com/site/mosaiccovenant/reading
  18. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/09/30/opc-republication-report-summary/
SRR 41 Doug Douma on the “The Presbyterian Philosopher" Gordon H. Clark

Join Tim and Carlos for a special edition of Semper Reformanda Radio! We interview Douglas J. Douma about his new book, The Presbyterian Philosopher: The Authorized Biography of Gordon H. Clark and discuss the life, the controversies--including the infamous Clark-Van Til controversy, in which Clark was opposed by Cornelius Van Til and a faction from the Westminster Seminary faculty--and the many contributions of "America's Augustine." You don't wanna miss this!

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Find us on Facebook or email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com.

Rate and Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

“Scripturalism—Christianity—is a whole view of things thought out together. It engages non-Christian philosophies on every field of intellectual endeavor. It furnishes a coherent theory of knowledge, an infallible salvation, a refutation of science, a theory of the world, a coherent and practical system of ethics, and the principles required for political liberty and justice. No other philosophy does.” (John Robbins, “An Introduction to Gordon H. Clark,” http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=192)

Resources (Recommended ones noted with a '+')

+ Get Doug's book @ https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2017/01/23/now-available-the-presbyterian-philosopher-the-authorized-biography-of-gordon-h-clark/

+ Thomas W. Juodaitis, "The Presbyterian Philosopher by Douglas J. Douma - A Review," http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=325

+ The Presbyterian Philosopher Facebook page, facebook.com/ThePresbyterianPhilosopher

+ Doug Douma, "A List of Differences Between the Thought of Gordon H. Clark and Cornelius Van Til," https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2016/10/13/a-list-of-differences-between-the-thought-of-gordon-h-clark-and-cornelius-van-til/

+ Gordon H. Clark, "Introduction to Theology," https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2017/01/01/introduction-to-theology-by-gordon-h-clark-introduction-and-table-of-contents/

- JOHN WISTAR BETZOLD, EUGENE BRADFORD, R. B. KUIPER, LEROY B. OLIVER, N. B. STONEHOUSE, MURRAY FORST THOMPSON, WILLIAM E. WELMERS, PAUL WOOLLEY, CORNELIUS VAN TIL, EDWARD J. YOUNG, DAVID FREEMAN, ARTHUR W. KUSCHKE, JR. "The Text of a Complaint Against Actions of the Presbytery of Philadelphia In the Matter of the Licensure and Ordination of Dr. Gordon H. Clark," http://gordonhclark.reformed.info/the-complaint/

+ Alan Tichenor (Chairman), Robert Strong (Secretary), Floyd E. Hamilton, Edwin H. Rian, Gordon H. Clark. "THE ANSWER TO A COMPLAINT AGAINST SEVERAL ACTIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE PRESBYTERY OF PHILADELPHIA TAKEN IN A SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON JULY 7, 1944: Proposed to the Presbytery of Philadelphia of The Orthodox Presbyterian Church by the Committee Elected by Presbytery to Prepare Such an Answer," http://gordonhclark.reformed.info/the-answer/

+ John Robbins, Can The Orthodox Presbyterian Church Be Saved?, http://www.trinitylectures.org/can-the-orthodox-presbyterian-church-be-saved-p-148.html

+ Herman Hoeksema, The Clark Van-Til Controversy, http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=220. "This book is a series of editorials written at the time of the so-called Clark-Van Til controversy in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church in the mid-1940's. The essays are some of the best analyses of its meaning we have seen in print, written by the editor of the Standard Bearer. Far from being a sideshow, and far from being dead, the assault on the doctrines of Scripture by the faculty of Westminster Seminary determined the path that the Seminary, and to some extent, the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, would follow for the remainder of the century." (http://www.trinitylectures.org/clark-van-til-controversy-the-p-67.html)

- DG Hart, "After the Breakup, Heartbreak: Conservative Presbyterians without a Common Foe," http://phs-app-media.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/jph862_Hart.pdf

"There are still very strong misrepresentations–even slanders–of Clark today, particularly from Van Tilians. Here are a few examples from Scott Oliphint, Apologia Radio, and Reformed Forum" (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/06/knowledge-faith-marks-true-clarkian/):

- https://www.facebook.com/groups/CFDD1/permalink/791646060853020/ - https://www.facebook.com/ApologiaRadio/posts/324063354406639 - http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc163/ - http://www.apologiaradio.com/?p=482

+ Gordon Clark Facebook Groups

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ghc.discussions/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/568173876667424/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/1450409248526249/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/706816492675447/

+ Intro to Clark and Scripturalism

• “Scripturalism: A Christian Worldview” by W. Gary Crampton o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=276 • “An Introduction to Gordon H. Clark” by John W. Robbins o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=192 • “The Biblical View of Truth” by John W. Robbins o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=205 • “The Bible As Truth” by Gordon H. Clark o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=258 • “What Is Christian Philosophy?” by John W. Robbins o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=218 • “A Christian Appraisal of Contemporary Philosophy” by Gordon H. Clark o http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=80 • “The Necessity of Gordon Clark” by B.K. Campbell o https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/articles/onsite/Necessity_of_Gordon_Clark.pdf

SRR #10 | Where's New Covenant Theology? A Closer Look at the London Baptist Confessions

Take a closer look at the context and content of historic Baptist confessions of faith with Carlos and Owen as they investigate New Covenant Theology's (NCT) attempts to find itself in the 1st London Baptist Confession of 1644/46; NCT’s claims regarding the 2nd London Baptist Confession of 1689 and its authors; and the implications this has on the Law, Evangelism, and Covenant Theology. Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com! Check out our blog: http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/#!semper-reformanda-radio/a0zyx Rate and Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

References (recommended resources are noted with a '+'): + "A Comparison of the 1644 & 1646 London Baptist Confession of Faith", http://gospelpedlar.com/articles/Church%20History/Bapt%20Conf/index.html • http://www.ncbcnorcal.com/#!1644/c19o6 + http://www.chapellibrary.org/book/lbco/london-baptist-confession-of-faith-_-1689 + James M. Renihan, "CONFESSING THE FAITH IN 1644 AND 1689", http://www.reformedreader.org/ctf.htm + "Reformed Resources from a 1689 Perspective: Of New Covenant Theology [Resource Roundup]", includes Dr. James Renihan’s exposition of the entire 1st LBC 1644/1646, http://confessingbaptist.com/nct/ + Richard C. Barcellos, In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/467909.In_Defense_of_the_Decalogue_ + Reformed Resources from a 1689 Perspective, "Tag: New Covenant Theology", http://confessingbaptist.com/tag/New-Covenant-Theology/ + http://www.1689federalism.com/ + http://www.1689conference.org/ + http://www.chapellibrary.org/ + "A Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist Covenant Theology", From Recovering a Covenantal Heritage: Essays in Baptist Covenant Theology, ed. Richard C. Barcellos, RBAP, 2014, http://www.unherautdansle.net/by-farther-steps-part-1/ + Micah and Samuel Renihan, "REFORMED BAPTIST COVENANT THEOLOGY AND BIBLICAL THEOLOGY", https://thelogcollege.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/rb-cov-theo-renihans.pdf + Denault, Pascal, Mac Wigfield, and Elizabeth Wigfield. 2013. The distinctiveness of Baptist covenant theology: a comparison between seventeenth-century Particular Baptist and paedobaptist federalism, https://www.amazon.com/Distinctiveness-Baptist-Covenant-Theology-Seventeenth-Century-ebook/dp/B00QZNH38S/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= + Coxe, Nehemiah, Ronald D. Miller, James M. Renihan, Francisco Orozco, John Owen, and Nehemiah Coxe. 2005. Covenant theology from Adam to Christ, https://www.amazon.com/Covenant-Theology-Christ-Nehemiah-Coxe-ebook/dp/B00YCX8I96/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1470764564&sr=8-2

SRR #9 | Hacking New Covenant Theology's Growing Straw Man Army to Pieces | Reformed Use of the Law

Join Tim, Carlos, and Owen as they clear the air regarding recent interactions with the hosts of “Conversations From The Porch,” a New Covenant Theology podcast, and take a look at the claims and straw mans that Pastor Shane Kastler made on their podcast regarding Reformed Baptists, Covenant Theology, and John Calvin and the Reformed view of the Law. ADDENDUM: I, Carlos, sincerely apologize to Pastor Shane Kastler. I'm primarily responsible for leading the charge against him. My zeal got out of hand and I apologize for that and for saying he sounded postmodern and that he was sloppy. It was very uncharitable of me.

I was confused by his comments on CFTP 16 at around 1:26:00 (https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-16-special-guest-shane-kastler-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf) and when he said it doesn't matter if all the 1644 LBCF authors held to covenant theology, but he reached out to us and said he affirms the importance of authorial intent. He was very gracious and even willing to come on the show. We look forward to clearing the air and discussing our disagreements in brotherly love. So stay tuned!

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com!

References (recommended resources are noted with a '+'): • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-16-special-guest-shane-kastler-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-17-house-keeping-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf-pt-2 • http://shanekastler.typepad.com/pastor_shanes_blog/2016/02/refuting-john-calvins-three-uses-of-the-law.html + Richard C. Barcellos, In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/467909.In_Defense_of_the_Decalogue_ + “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF,” www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html + http://www.chapellibrary.org/book/gcat/gadsbys-catechism + http://www.christusvictornetwork.com/ask-a-millennial-christian/hermeneutics-the-art-and-science-of-interpretation/ + Gordon H. Clark, What Do Presbyterians Believe?, Collection 10: Christian Theology, www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php