Posts tagged New Covenant Theology
SRR 111 Emails, Events, Books, Controversies

Carlos and Tim catch up on emails, recent events, personal updates, and controversies about Apologetics and the Jeff Durbin/Andy Stanley exchange, School dress ups and gender, Christians and entertainment, Roman Catholic Baptism and Presbyterians, Charles Hodge and JH Thornwell, Richard Gaffin and Justification, and Piper and being Counted Righteous in Christ.

Charles Hodge on the Roman Catholic Church:

Indeed it is a matter of devout thankfulness to God that underneath the numerous grievous and destructive errors of the Romish Church, the great truths of the Gospel are preserved. The Trinity, the true divinity of Christ, the true doctrine concerning his person as God and man in two distinct natures and one person forever, salvation through his blood, regeneration and sanctification through the almighty power of the Spirit, the resurrection of the body, and eternal life, are doctrines on which the people of God in that communion live, and have produced such saintly men as St. Bernard, Fenelon, and doubtless thousands of others who are of the number of God’s elect. (John Robbins, http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=228)

References

https://thorncrownministries.com/blog/2018/5/6/john-piper-final-salvation-and-the-decline-and-fall-of-sola-fide-part-i

https://thorncrownministries.com/blog/2018/9/16/john-piper-final-salvation-and-the-decline-and-fall-of-sola-fide-part-ii

http://www.trinitylectures.org/sacramental-sorcery-p-161.html

http://www.trinitylectures.org/emperor-has-no-clothes-the-p-182.html

CALVIN ON THE VALIDITY OF 'ROMISH' BAPTISM, http://www.semperreformanda.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Calvin-on-the-Validity-of-Romish-Baptism-Dr.-F.N.-Lee.pdf

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2810687752

https://youtu.be/BnS5Z-A_5jA

http://www.ironsharpensironradio.com/podcast/september-1-2017-show-with-david-j-engelsma-on-the-gospel-truth-of-justification-proclaimed-defended-developed/

https://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2019/04/29/endgame/

Dallas Exhibits

https://www.biblicalarts.org

https://dma.org

https://buc-ees.com/index.php

http://easttexaszoo.com

http://creationevidence.org/

http://adamantbeliever.com

https://www.exministries.com

SRR 92 Brandon Adams on Covenant Theology & Republication, Part I

Carlos and Tim interview Brandon Adams from 1689federalism.com on Covenant Theology; differences between Presbyterian, Reformed Baptist, and New Covenant Theology; Republication and Westminster West vs Westminster East; Law and Gospel; and more!

ThornCrownMinistries.com

 

References

  1. http://www.1689federalism.com/from-shadow-to-substance/
  2. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/murray-on-lev-185-why-did-john-murray-reject-the-covenant-of-works/
  3. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2018/08/24/notes-on-a-podcast-discussion-with-patrick-hines-on-covenant-theology-baptism/
  4. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2018/08/30/acceptable-understanding-of-mosaic-law-according-to-the-opc-report-on-republication/
  5. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/10/24/opc-report-on-republication-background/
  6. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/07/25/guy-waters-on-leviticus-185/
  7. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/11/13/piper-vs-owen-on-romans-26-7-13/
  8. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/is-john-piper-confessional/
  9. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/nehemiah-coxe-on-merit-in-lbcf-7-1/
  10. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2017/02/22/1689-federalism-americas-founding/
  11. http://www.1689federalism.com/republication-the-mosaic-covenant-and-eternal-life/
  12. http://www.1689federalism.com/1689-federalism-theonomy/
  13. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/05/17/calvin-vs-1689-federalism-on-old-vs-new/
  14. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/02/01/can-r-scott-clark-be-truly-reformed/
  15. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/neonomian-presbyterians-vs-antinomian-congregationalists/
  16. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2010/11/22/summary-of-venemas-review-of-tlnf/
  17. “In Defense of Moses” and Venema’s review https://sites.google.com/site/mosaiccovenant/reading
  18. https://contrast2.wordpress.com/2016/09/30/opc-republication-report-summary/
SRR 86 The Covenant of Works & New Covenant Theology, Part II

Carlos and Tim build a positive case for the Covenant of Works, discuss the relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology, and throw down the gauntlet to New Covenant Theology proponents by proving it with a simple Bible phrase.

References (Recommended ones noted with a '+')

 +The Distinctiveness of Baptist Covenant Theology: A Comparison Between Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist and Paedobaptist Federalism [Revised Edition] by Pascal Denault, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23827777

+Hodge's Commentary on Romans 5, http://www.reformed.org/books/romans/rom_5b_hodge.html

+Richard Barcellos, https://press.founders.org/shop/getting-the-garden-right/

+Grace Family Baptist Church's Sermon Series, "Covenant, Law, and Sabbath," https://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?sourceonly=true&currSection=sermonssource&keyword=gracefamilybaptist&subsetcat=series&subsetitem=Covenant%2C+Law%2C+and+Sabbath

+http://confessingbaptist.com/1689Federalism/2015/06/12/kingdom-through-covenant-review-sam-renihan/

+https://thorncrownministries.com/blog/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources

-The Letter To The Romans by William Barclay, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6508761

-http://wv4g.org/2013/12/14/new-covenant-theology-interview-blake-white/

-Gentry & Wellum, https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/gentry-and-wellum-respond-to-kingdom-through-covenant-reviews

+Walter J. Chantry, https://www.chapellibrary.org/book/cove/covenants,-the--(works-&-grace

+Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, ed. James T. Dennison Jr., trans. George Musgrave Giger, vol. 1 (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1992–97), 575–76 (8.3.6–8), http://heidelblog.net/2016/03/turretin-defended-covenant-works/

+https://accordingtochrist.com/

+"One consequence of this denial of the covenant of works is that if Adam was not a party to the covenant of works, as these men assert, then neither was Christ, the Second and Last Adam. Therefore, Christ could not, did not, and was not supposed to pay the debts of, and earn salvation for, his people. As the Second and Last Adam, Christ did not by his active and passive obedience fulfill the Law of God, pay the debts of his people, and merit their salvation. Thus the denial of the covenant of works is an attack on the justice of God: on the imputation of Adam’s sin to his children, on the active obedience and work of Christ, on the imputation of Christ’s active obedience and righteousness to believers. By denying that Adam and Christ, as federal heads of their respective races, were subject to the covenant of works before the court of God’s justice, not his grace, each Adam being required to fulfill the terms of the covenant, one failing miserably, and the other succeeding perfectly, the Neolegalists put all believers on probation, and make their salvation depend on their own evangelical obedience." (John Robbins, http://trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=113)

SRR 85 The Covenant of Works & New Covenant Theology, Part I

Carlos and Tim build a positive case for the Covenant of Works, discuss the relationship between Biblical and Systematic Theology, and throw down the gauntlet to New Covenant Theology proponents by proving it with a simple Bible phrase.

References (Recommended ones noted with a '+')

 +The Distinctiveness of Baptist Covenant Theology: A Comparison Between Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist and Paedobaptist Federalism [Revised Edition] by Pascal Denault, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23827777

+Hodge's Commentary on Romans 5, http://www.reformed.org/books/romans/rom_5b_hodge.html

+Richard Barcellos, https://press.founders.org/shop/getting-the-garden-right/

+Grace Family Baptist Church's Sermon Series, "Covenant, Law, and Sabbath," https://www.sermonaudio.com/search.asp?sourceonly=true&currSection=sermonssource&keyword=gracefamilybaptist&subsetcat=series&subsetitem=Covenant%2C+Law%2C+and+Sabbath

+http://confessingbaptist.com/1689Federalism/2015/06/12/kingdom-through-covenant-review-sam-renihan/

+https://thorncrownministries.com/blog/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources

-The Letter To The Romans by William Barclay, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6508761

-http://wv4g.org/2013/12/14/new-covenant-theology-interview-blake-white/

-Gentry & Wellum, https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/gentry-and-wellum-respond-to-kingdom-through-covenant-reviews

+Walter J. Chantry, https://www.chapellibrary.org/book/cove/covenants,-the--(works-&-grace

+Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, ed. James T. Dennison Jr., trans. George Musgrave Giger, vol. 1 (Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1992–97), 575–76 (8.3.6–8), http://heidelblog.net/2016/03/turretin-defended-covenant-works/

+https://accordingtochrist.com/

+"One consequence of this denial of the covenant of works is that if Adam was not a party to the covenant of works, as these men assert, then neither was Christ, the Second and Last Adam. Therefore, Christ could not, did not, and was not supposed to pay the debts of, and earn salvation for, his people. As the Second and Last Adam, Christ did not by his active and passive obedience fulfill the Law of God, pay the debts of his people, and merit their salvation. Thus the denial of the covenant of works is an attack on the justice of God: on the imputation of Adam’s sin to his children, on the active obedience and work of Christ, on the imputation of Christ’s active obedience and righteousness to believers. By denying that Adam and Christ, as federal heads of their respective races, were subject to the covenant of works before the court of God’s justice, not his grace, each Adam being required to fulfill the terms of the covenant, one failing miserably, and the other succeeding perfectly, the Neolegalists put all believers on probation, and make their salvation depend on their own evangelical obedience." (John Robbins, http://trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=113)

SRR 47 Interview with Andrew Rappaport | Sanctification & Monergistic Synergism | NCT & the Law

Join Carlos, Tim, and special guest Andrew Rappaport as we formally apologize to brother Andrew for misrepresenting him on our previous episode, and ask him about apologetics and dialoguing with others; Carlos and Tim then discuss Andrew’s recent Clashing of Theologies episode on Sanctification and give historical, theological, and definitional criticisms of Pastor Paul Kaiser’s Synergistic view of Conversion and his claim that it’s the “true” Reformed view; and discuss New Covenant Theology, the moral law, and sanctification…and David Gay.

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Find us on Facebook or contact us: https://thorncrownministries.com/contact

Rate and Review us on iTunes:

https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=1372525774

Resources (Recommended with a '+'):

+ Check out Carlos’ interactions with BTWN hosts, including Pastor Paul Kaiser of CFTP, on Andrew’s Sanctification | Clashing of Theology | SFE | BTWN @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0APHlh8vpI

+ Get Andrew Rappaport’s What Do They Believe? http://strivingforeternity.org/product/what-do-they-believe-book/

+ Semper Reformanda Radio’s New Covenant Theology Playlist and Resources, http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources/

+ Sam Waldron & Richard Barcellos, A Reformed Baptist Manifesto: The New Covenant Constitution of the Church, http://www.rbap.net/our-books/a-reformed-baptist-manifesto-the-new-covenant-constitution-of-the-church-by-sam-waldron-richard-bacellos/

+ shortercatechism.com

+ http://www.chapellibrary.org/

+ Puritan Homeschool Curriculum, http://www.puritans.net/curriculum/

+ John Robbins, “An Introduction to Gordon H. Clark,” http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=192

+ Gordon H. Clark, “God and Logic,” http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=16

 

Books by Gordon Clark @ http://www.trinitylectures.org/books-c-21.html

+ Gordon Clark, What Is Saving Faith? http://www.trinitylectures.org/what-is-saving-faith-p-60.html

+ Gordon Clark, Signature Series, Volume 4: Christian Philosophy, http://www.trinitylectures.org/christian-philosophy-the-works-of-gordon-haddon-clark-volume-paperback-p-145.html

+ Gordon Clark, God & Evil: The Problem Solved, http://www.trinitylectures.org/god-and-evil-the-problem-solved-p-86.html

+ Gordon H. Clark, "Introduction to Theology," https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2017/01/01/introduction-to-theology-by-gordon-h-clark-introduction-and-table-of-contents/

 

+ Gordon Clark Facebook Groups:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ghc.discussions/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/568173876667424/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1450409248526249/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/706816492675447/

 

Public Service Announcements

 

ADDENDUM (6/12/2017): I, Carlos Montijo, am deeply sorry and apologize to Andrew Rappaport for misrepresenting what he said about Covenant Theology in his interview with Theology Gals Episode 8 (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/03/theology-gals-episode-8-dispensationalism-andrew-rappaport/). I misunderstood what he said at minute 12:40 by assuming he was referring to the claim that the threefold division of the law came from Aquinas, based on a previous discussion that wasn’t public. We are removing that portion from the episode. I deeply regret giving our listeners the impression that brother Andrew was sloppy or careless in his presentation of Covenant Theology. Quite the opposite is true, for anyone who knows him is aware that he is extremely diligent to be as fair and accurate as possible when presenting views that are not his own. We at Semper Reformanda Radio share the same convictions and strive to emulate his quintessential example. I am also very grateful to brother Andrew for the opportunity he provided me to discuss Covenant Theology and New Covenant Theology with Louis Lyons, and for being able to participate in his Clashing of Theologies series, because brother Andrew recognizes the importance of direct interaction with one another, especially opposing views, which in many cases is far more fruitful than one-sided monologues.

I also want to clarify my comments about Jason Mullett being “largely ignorant” of New Covenant Theology. It was not at all meant to be an insult or jab, nor was I at all implying or suggesting that I would have been the “better” representative against Dustin Segers, who is a knowledgeable and seasoned NCT proponent. It was simply based on what Jason himself said on Conversations From The Porch #50 @42:55, that he had not done a lot of reading on NCT and that the only thing he had read was the first three chapters of Charles Leiter’s The Law of Christ. Anyone who actually listened to our episode knows that I commended brother Jason for being an excellent debater, especially on topics that he knows well, such as his discussions with Leighton Flowers on Calvinism (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/24/lbm-episode-0068-dialogue-dr-leighton-flowers-libertarian-free-will/; even Flowers commended Jason for representing the Calvinist view well). I said I was disappointed because if Jason had done more reading, he would have been better prepared to interact with Dustin’s arguments, some of which were based on misunderstandings of the Reformed faith.

One example is in minute 53:00 of CFTP Episode 50, where Dustin claims that the Reformed view equates the moral law to the Ten Commandments (exclusively) and further claims that, historically this is how Reformed guys have always defined it. Unfortunately, many New Covenant Theology proponents make this error. Conversations From The Porch has continued to repeat this error, despite our attempts to correct it, including in this episode. All they need to do is read the Westminster Larger Catechism, Questions 93 and 98:

  1. 93. What is the moral law?

  2. The moral law is the declaration of the will of God to mankind, directing and binding everyone to personal, perfect, and perpetual conformity and obedience thereunto, in the frame and disposition of the whole man, soul and body, and in performance of all those duties of holiness and righteousness which he oweth to God and man: promising life upon the fulfilling, and threatening death upon the breach of it.

  3. 98. Where is the moral law summarily comprehended?

  4. The moral law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments, which were delivered by the voice of God upon Mount Sinai, and written by him in two tables of stone; and are recorded in the twentieth chapter of Exodus. The four first commandments containing our duty to God, and the other six our duty to man. (http://www.reformed.org/documents/wlc_w_proofs/)

I nevertheless think Jason did a great job and hope he continues to study NCT and engage in discussions/debates with them (perhaps we can even join forces in the future 😉). Maybe it would have been better for me to say that Jason’s knowledge of NCT was limited as opposed to “largely ignorant of”. I have no problem admitting that I am largely ignorant of many things, and I’m sure Jason is far more knowledgeable than I am about many things. As fellow Reformed Baptists we are very much in agreement with Jason and even listed his episode on NCT on our playlist (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources/). I did not at all dismiss Jason for not being a Sabbatarian, as Pastor Paul Kaiser of Conversations From The Porch claimed in minute 53:00 of their recent episode (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/06/10/cftp-presents-ramblings-porch-public-service-correction/), nor did I ever say that Jason didn't know what he was talking about, or “immodestly imply” that I would have done better, as Ryan Dozier claimed in minute 51:30.

I hope that we can have more dialogue/discussions in the future and sharpen each other as brothers in Christ.

 

Semper Reformanda,

Carlos Montijo

SRR #46 | NCT, LGBT, Homeschool Public Service Announcements | Which Apologetic Is Biblical?

Join Carlos, Tim, and Joseph with guns blazing for New Covenant Theology, LGBT, and Postmillennialism Public Service Announcements; emails; Christian homeschool curriculums; an introduction to Gordon Clark's work and apologetic; and being diligent to study apologetics. ADDENDUM (6/12/2017): I, Carlos Montijo, am deeply sorry and apologize to Andrew Rappaport for misrepresenting what he said about Covenant Theology in his interview with Theology Gals, Episode 8 (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/03/theology-gals-episode-8-dispensationalism-andrew-rappaport/). I misunderstood what he said at minute 12:40 by assuming he was referring to the claim that the threefold division of the law came from Aquinas, based on a previous discussion that wasn’t public. We are removing that portion from the episode. I deeply regret giving our listeners the impression that brother Andrew was sloppy or careless in his presentation of Covenant Theology. Quite the opposite is true, for anyone who knows him is aware that he is extremely diligent to be as fair and accurate as possible when presenting views that are not his own. We at Semper Reformanda Radio share the same convictions and strive to emulate his quintessential example. I am also very grateful to brother Andrew for the opportunity he provided me to discuss Covenant Theology and New Covenant Theology with Louis Lyons, and for being able to participate in his Clashing of Theologies series, because he recognizes the importance of direct interaction with one another, especially opposing views, which in many cases is far more fruitful than one-sided monologues.

I also want to clarify my comments about Jason Mullett being “largely ignorant” of New Covenant Theology. It was not at all meant to be an insult or jab, nor was I at all implying or suggesting that I would have been the “better” representative against Dustin Segers, who is a knowledgeable and seasoned NCT proponent. It was simply based on what Jason himself said on Conversations From The Porch #50 @1:04:30, that he had not done a lot of reading on NCT and that the only thing he had read was the first three chapters of Charles Leiter’s The Law of Christ. Anyone who actually listened to our episode knows that I commended brother Jason for being an excellent debater, especially on topics that he knows well, such as his discussions with Leighton Flowers on Calvinism (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/24/lbm-episode-0068-dialogue-dr-leighton-flowers-libertarian-free-will/; even Flowers commended Jason for representing the Calvinist view well). I said I was disappointed because if Jason had done more reading, he would have been better prepared to interact with Dustin’s arguments, some of which were based on misunderstandings of the Reformed faith.

One example is in minute 1:23:00 of CFTP Episode 50, where Dustin claims that the Reformed view equates the moral law to the Ten Commandments (exclusively) and further claims that, historically this is how covenant theologians have always defined it. Unfortunately, many New Covenant Theology proponents make this error. Conversations From The Porch has continued to repeat this error, despite our attempts to correct it, including in this episode. All they need to do is read the Westminster Larger Catechism, Questions 93 and 98:

Q93. What is the moral law?

A. The moral law is the declaration of the will of God to mankind, directing and binding everyone to personal, perfect, and perpetual conformity and obedience thereunto, in the frame and disposition of the whole man, soul and body, and in performance of all those duties of holiness and righteousness which he oweth to God and man: promising life upon the fulfilling, and threatening death upon the breach of it.

Q 98. Where is the moral law summarily comprehended?

A. The moral law is summarily comprehended in the ten commandments, which were delivered by the voice of God upon Mount Sinai, and written by him in two tables of stone; and are recorded in the twentieth chapter of Exodus. The four first commandments containing our duty to God, and the other six our duty to man. (http://www.reformed.org/documents/wlc_w_proofs/)

I nevertheless think Jason did a great job and hope he continues to study NCT and engage in discussions/debates with them. Perhaps we can even join forces in the future 😉. Maybe it would have been better for me to say that Jason’s knowledge of NCT was limited as opposed to “largely ignorant of”. I myself am largely ignorant of many things, and I’m sure Jason is far more knowledgeable than I am about many things. As fellow Reformed Baptists we are very much in agreement with Jason and even listed his episode critiquing NCT on our playlist (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources/). I did not at all dismiss Jason for not being a Sabbatarian, as Pastor Paul Kaiser of Conversations From The Porch claimed in minute 53:00 of their recent episode (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/06/10/cftp-presents-ramblings-porch-public-service-correction/), nor did I ever say that Jason didn't know what he was talking about, or “immodestly imply” that I would have done better, as Ryan Dozier claimed in minute 51:30.

I hope we can all have more fruitful discussions in the future and sharpen each other as brothers in Christ.

Semper Reformanda,

Carlos Montijo

 

Public Service Announcements

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Find us on Facebook or email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com.

Rate and Review us on iTunes:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

 Articles by Semper Reformanda Radio:

http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/semper-reformanda-radio/

“Scripturalism—Christianity—is a whole view of things thought out together. It engages non-Christian philosophies on every field of intellectual endeavor. It furnishes a coherent theory of knowledge, an infallible salvation, a refutation of science, a theory of the world, a coherent and practical system of ethics, and the principles required for political liberty and justice. No other philosophy does.” (John Robbins, “An Introduction to Gordon H. Clark,” http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=192)

Resources (Recommended ones noted with a '+'):

+ shortercatechism.com

+ Puritan Homeschool Curriculum, http://www.puritans.net/curriculum/

+ Semper Reformanda Radio’s New Covenant Theology Playlist and Resources, http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/03/22/semper-reformanda-radio-new-covenant-theology-playlist-resources/

 + Books by Gordon Clark: http://www.trinitylectures.org/books-c-21.html

+ Gordon Clark Facebook Groups:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/ghc.discussions/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/568173876667424/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1450409248526249/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/706816492675447/

 

+ Doug Douma, "A List of Differences Between the Thought of Gordon H. Clark and Cornelius Van Til," https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2016/10/13/a-list-of-differences-between-the-thought-of-gordon-h-clark-and-cornelius-van-til/

+ Gordon H. Clark, "Introduction to Theology," https://douglasdouma.wordpress.com/2017/01/01/introduction-to-theology-by-gordon-h-clark-introduction-and-table-of-contents/

- JOHN WISTAR BETZOLD, EUGENE BRADFORD, R. B. KUIPER, LEROY B. OLIVER, N. B. STONEHOUSE, MURRAY FORST THOMPSON, WILLIAM E. WELMERS, PAUL WOOLLEY, CORNELIUS VAN TIL, EDWARD J. YOUNG, DAVID FREEMAN, ARTHUR W. KUSCHKE, JR. "The Text of a Complaint Against Actions of the Presbytery of Philadelphia In the Matter of the Licensure and Ordination of Dr. Gordon H. Clark," http://gordonhclark.reformed.info/the-complaint/

+ Alan Tichenor (Chairman), Robert Strong (Secretary), Floyd E. Hamilton, Edwin H. Rian, Gordon H. Clark. "THE ANSWER TO A COMPLAINT AGAINST SEVERAL ACTIONS AND DECISIONS OF THE PRESBYTERY OF PHILADELPHIA TAKEN IN A SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON JULY 7, 1944: Proposed to the Presbytery of Philadelphia of The Orthodox Presbyterian Church by the Committee Elected by Presbytery to Prepare Such an Answer," http://gordonhclark.reformed.info/the-answer/

"There are still very strong misrepresentations–even slanders–of Clark today, particularly from Van Tilians. Here are a few examples from Scott Oliphint, Apologia Radio, and Reformed Forum" (http://biblethumpingwingnut.com/2017/04/06/knowledge-faith-marks-true-clarkian/):

- https://www.facebook.com/groups/CFDD1/permalink/791646060853020/

- https://www.facebook.com/ApologiaRadio/posts/324063354406639

- http://reformedforum.org/podcasts/ctc163/

- http://www.apologiaradio.com/?p=482

 

+ Intro to Clark and Scripturalism

 + “God and Logic” by Gordon H. Clark, http://www.trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=16

SRR #14 | Response to CFTP | SFE Discussion: Covenant Theology vs New Covenant Theology, Part 2

Join Carlos, Tim, and Owen as they answer the Conversations From The Porch’s (CFTP) marathon episode about SRR, and for the second half of the Striving for Eternity Theological Discussion between Carlos Montijo, representing Covenant Theology, and Louis Lyons (http://www.emmausroadsugarland.org/), representing New Covenant Theology, on the topic of Covenant Theology vs. New Covenant Theology that took place on 19 September 2016. Watch the full SFE discussion @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuuUQ7v1zMw

Thanks to Andrew Rappaport from Striving for Eternity Ministries! (http://strivingforeternity.org/)

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com Our blog: http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/semper-reformanda-radio Rate and Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

References (Recommended Resources noted with a '+'): + New Covenant Theology, Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel, (Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 2002), reviewed by Richard C. Barcellos, http://www.reformedreader.org/rbb/bom/newcovenanttheologycritique.htm + Sam Waldren, “THEONOMY, A REFORMED BAPTIST ASSESSMENT”, http://www.reformedreader.org/rbs/tarba.htm + “Was the Mosaic Covenant THE Covenant of Works?” http://www.1689federalism.com/faq/was-the-mosaic-covenant-the-covenant-of-works/ + “Of Marriage, Chapter Twenty-Five of the 1689 Baptist Confession [Audio] – Daniel Chamberlin,” http://confessingbaptist.com/of-marriage-chapter-twenty-five-of-the-1689-baptist-confession-audio-daniel-chamberlin/ + John Greer, “One Day in Seven,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?m=t&s=13116514580 + “Covenant Theology Lectures – Sam Renihan”, http://www.1689federalism.com/covenant-theology-lectures-sam-renihan/ + Reformed Baptist Fellowship and Theology Forum, https://www.facebook.com/groups/reformedbaptist/ + “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF,” http://www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html + 1689 Federalism Playlist, https://youtu.be/_lKe2VopL9k?list=PL31jRTd9ppYsoclH-9_ZnIoSSoj3IEsvP + Voddie Baucham, “The Sabbath Before the Command,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=410151353280 + JD Hall, “Count the Cost of Being a Polemicist,” http://pca.st/COJ6 + JD Hall, “More On Sectarian Minimalism,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=9231622801 • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-18-new-covenant-theologys-straw-man-army-responds-to-srr-pack-a-lunch?in=biblethumpingwingnut/sets/conversations-from-the-porch • Joel McDurmon, Incest is “holy in God’s sight”?: a Westminster West grad gets consistent with his R2K, http://americanvision.org/9836/incest-holy-gods-sight-westminster-west-grad-gets-consistent-r2k/ • David Gay, “No Confession? Nothing to Debate!”, http://media.sermonaudio.com/articles/da-8261610237-1.PDF • Louis Lyons, “Proving New Covenant Theology with Only One Bible Verse”, http://www.thepastorspen.org/2016/04/proving-new-covenant-theology-with-only.html

SRR #13 | SFE Debriefing and Discussion: Covenant Theology vs New Covenant Theology, Part I

Join Owen, Carlos, and Tim as they debrief the Striving for Eternity Theological Discussion between Carlos Montijo, representing Covenant Theology, and Louis Lyons (http://www.emmausroadsugarland.org/), representing New Covenant Theology, on the topic of Covenant Theology vs. New Covenant Theology that took place on 19 September 2016. Watch the full discussion @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuuUQ7v1zMw

And thanks to Andrew Rappaport from Striving for Eternity Ministries (http://strivingforeternity.org/), we’re providing the audio of the first half of the discussion! We’ll publish the second half on our next episode so stay tuned.

A big shout out to brother Andrew for setting it up and to brother Louis for his willingness to dialogue!

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com! Our blog: http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/semper-reformanda-radio Rate and Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

References (recommended resources are noted with a '+'): + Voddie Baucham, “The Sabbath Before the Command,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=410151353280 + New Covenant Theology, Tom Wells and Fred Zaspel, (Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 2002), reviewed by Richard C. Barcellos, http://www.reformedreader.org/rbb/bom/newcovenanttheologycritique.htm + Sam Waldren, “THEONOMY, A REFORMED BAPTIST ASSESSMENT”, http://www.reformedreader.org/rbs/tarba.htm + “Was the Mosaic Covenant THE Covenant of Works?” http://www.1689federalism.com/faq/was-the-mosaic-covenant-the-covenant-of-works/ + “Of Marriage, Chapter Twenty-Five of the 1689 Baptist Confession [Audio] – Daniel Chamberlin,” http://confessingbaptist.com/of-marriage-chapter-twenty-five-of-the-1689-baptist-confession-audio-daniel-chamberlin/ + John Greer, “One Day in Seven,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?m=t&s=13116514580 + “Covenant Theology Lectures – Sam Renihan”, http://www.1689federalism.com/covenant-theology-lectures-sam-renihan/ + Reformed Baptist Fellowship and Theology Forum, https://www.facebook.com/groups/reformedbaptist/ + “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF,” http://www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html + 1689 Federalism Playlist, https://youtu.be/_lKe2VopL9k?list=PL31jRTd9ppYsoclH-9_ZnIoSSoj3IEsvP • Joel McDurmon, Incest is “holy in God’s sight”?: a Westminster West grad gets consistent with his R2K, http://americanvision.org/9836/incest-holy-gods-sight-westminster-west-grad-gets-consistent-r2k/ • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-21-hell-debate-brother-rc-striving-for-eternity-discussion-hangout • David Gay, “No Confession? Nothing to Debate!”, http://media.sermonaudio.com/articles/da-8261610237-1.PDF • Louis Lyons, “Proving New Covenant Theology with Only One Bible Verse”, http://www.thepastorspen.org/2016/04/proving-new-covenant-theology-with-only.html

SRR #10 | Where's New Covenant Theology? A Closer Look at the London Baptist Confessions

Take a closer look at the context and content of historic Baptist confessions of faith with Carlos and Owen as they investigate New Covenant Theology's (NCT) attempts to find itself in the 1st London Baptist Confession of 1644/46; NCT’s claims regarding the 2nd London Baptist Confession of 1689 and its authors; and the implications this has on the Law, Evangelism, and Covenant Theology. Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com! Check out our blog: http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/#!semper-reformanda-radio/a0zyx Rate and Review us on iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/bible%E2%80%A6t/id901586827?mt

References (recommended resources are noted with a '+'): + "A Comparison of the 1644 & 1646 London Baptist Confession of Faith", http://gospelpedlar.com/articles/Church%20History/Bapt%20Conf/index.html • http://www.ncbcnorcal.com/#!1644/c19o6 + http://www.chapellibrary.org/book/lbco/london-baptist-confession-of-faith-_-1689 + James M. Renihan, "CONFESSING THE FAITH IN 1644 AND 1689", http://www.reformedreader.org/ctf.htm + "Reformed Resources from a 1689 Perspective: Of New Covenant Theology [Resource Roundup]", includes Dr. James Renihan’s exposition of the entire 1st LBC 1644/1646, http://confessingbaptist.com/nct/ + Richard C. Barcellos, In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/467909.In_Defense_of_the_Decalogue_ + Reformed Resources from a 1689 Perspective, "Tag: New Covenant Theology", http://confessingbaptist.com/tag/New-Covenant-Theology/ + http://www.1689federalism.com/ + http://www.1689conference.org/ + http://www.chapellibrary.org/ + "A Seventeenth-Century Particular Baptist Covenant Theology", From Recovering a Covenantal Heritage: Essays in Baptist Covenant Theology, ed. Richard C. Barcellos, RBAP, 2014, http://www.unherautdansle.net/by-farther-steps-part-1/ + Micah and Samuel Renihan, "REFORMED BAPTIST COVENANT THEOLOGY AND BIBLICAL THEOLOGY", https://thelogcollege.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/rb-cov-theo-renihans.pdf + Denault, Pascal, Mac Wigfield, and Elizabeth Wigfield. 2013. The distinctiveness of Baptist covenant theology: a comparison between seventeenth-century Particular Baptist and paedobaptist federalism, https://www.amazon.com/Distinctiveness-Baptist-Covenant-Theology-Seventeenth-Century-ebook/dp/B00QZNH38S/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= + Coxe, Nehemiah, Ronald D. Miller, James M. Renihan, Francisco Orozco, John Owen, and Nehemiah Coxe. 2005. Covenant theology from Adam to Christ, https://www.amazon.com/Covenant-Theology-Christ-Nehemiah-Coxe-ebook/dp/B00YCX8I96/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1470764564&sr=8-2

SRR #9 | Hacking New Covenant Theology's Growing Straw Man Army to Pieces | Reformed Use of the Law

Join Tim, Carlos, and Owen as they clear the air regarding recent interactions with the hosts of “Conversations From The Porch,” a New Covenant Theology podcast, and take a look at the claims and straw mans that Pastor Shane Kastler made on their podcast regarding Reformed Baptists, Covenant Theology, and John Calvin and the Reformed view of the Law. ADDENDUM: I, Carlos, sincerely apologize to Pastor Shane Kastler. I'm primarily responsible for leading the charge against him. My zeal got out of hand and I apologize for that and for saying he sounded postmodern and that he was sloppy. It was very uncharitable of me.

I was confused by his comments on CFTP 16 at around 1:26:00 (https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-16-special-guest-shane-kastler-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf) and when he said it doesn't matter if all the 1644 LBCF authors held to covenant theology, but he reached out to us and said he affirms the importance of authorial intent. He was very gracious and even willing to come on the show. We look forward to clearing the air and discussing our disagreements in brotherly love. So stay tuned!

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com!

References (recommended resources are noted with a '+'): • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-16-special-guest-shane-kastler-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf • https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-17-house-keeping-comparing-the-confessions-the-1646-the-1689-lbcf-pt-2 • http://shanekastler.typepad.com/pastor_shanes_blog/2016/02/refuting-john-calvins-three-uses-of-the-law.html + Richard C. Barcellos, In Defense of the Decalogue: A Critique of New Covenant Theology, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/467909.In_Defense_of_the_Decalogue_ + “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF,” www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html + http://www.chapellibrary.org/book/gcat/gadsbys-catechism + http://www.christusvictornetwork.com/ask-a-millennial-christian/hermeneutics-the-art-and-science-of-interpretation/ + Gordon H. Clark, What Do Presbyterians Believe?, Collection 10: Christian Theology, www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php

SRR #6 | The Sabbath, Logic, and NCT's Straw Man Army | From Russia, With Love

Tim and Carlos are excited to introduce Owen Paun, a missionary to Bulgaria, to the podcast! In this episode, they discuss Russia's draconian, anti-evangelism laws; the Sabbath; quotes by New Covenant Theology (NCT) authors John Reisinger and David Gay; logic; NCT's army of fallacies; confessions; the tripartite distinction of the Mosaic law; and more. I apologize if I offended anyone when describing the Pharisees as retarded in a previous episode. I was not referring to the mentally handicapped, but to those who willfully deceive themselves and others. –Carlos

Questions? Comments? Feedback? Email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com!

References: •http://www.christusvictornetwork.com/ask-a-millennial-christian/rules-of-rhetoric-or-how-to-win-an-argument-without-even-trying/ •Voddie Baucham, “The Sabbath Before the Command,” http://www.sermonaudio.com/sermoninfo.asp?SID=410151353280 •Gordon H. Clark, "God and Logic," http://trinityfoundation.org/journal.php?id=16 •Michael D. Marlowe, "The Westminster Confession of Faith: According to the Text of the First Edition, and with the Original Scripture Proofs. With Notes Showing the Changes Introduced by Church Synods up to the Present Day," http://www.bible-researcher.com/wescon01.html •"American Revisions to the Westminster Confession of Faith," http://www.opc.org/documents/WCF_orig.html •Collection 10: Christian Theology, “What Do Presbyterians Believe?” by Gordon H. Clark, www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php •David Gay, Redemption History Through Covenants, https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bw8DX7Vtr3vJckUza1VQYnFGcE0/view •John Reisinger, Abraham’s Four Seeds, http://worldwithoutend.info/bbc/books/NC/abrahams_seed/intro.htm •http://s667673408.onlinehome.us/#!Christianity-and-Logic/c16h1/57a26b2c0cf2fd413b4bf948 •Elihu Carranza, The Logic Classroom, http://logic-classroom.weebly.com/ •Jonathan F. Bayes, The Threefold Division of the Law, www.christian.org.uk/wp-content/dow…of-the-law.pdf •Augustine, Contra Faustum, VI.2, http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/140606.htm •Justin Martyr, "Chapter XLV: Those who were righteous before and under the law shall be saved by Christ," Dialogue with Trypho, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf01.viii.iv.xlv.html •John Calvin, "Of Civil Government," Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Chapter 20, Section 14, http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.vi.xxi.html •Thomas Aquinas, "Of the Precepts of the Old Law," Summa Theologica, 2a, Question 99, Article 4, http://www.ccel.org/a/aquinas/summa/FS/FS099.html

SRR 5 Quarrels About Systematic Theology and the Law

In this episode, Tim and Carlos recap their criticisms of New Covenant Theology and take on the "NCT gauntlet" thrown down by Christopher Fales in Conversations From The Porch. The challenge is whether the Bible distinguishes the ceremonial, civil, and moral parts of the Mosaic law. They answer with the words of the Master Himself, presenting a Biblical case for the tripartite distinction of the law and discuss the relationship between justification and the law. Questions? Comments? Feedback? You can now email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com!

References:

• “The Threefold Division of the Law” by Jonathan F. Bayes

• "Biblical Apologetics: Jesus and Logic" by John Robbins, Collection 4: Defending the Faith, Level 1, The Trinity Foundation

• "Church History – The Footprints of God" by Tommy Nelson, Denton Bible Church

https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-1

http://crosstocrown.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NCT-Questions.pdf

• “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF

• “What Do Presbyterians Believe?” by Gordon H. Clark, Collection 10: Christian Theology, The Trinity Foundation, www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php

• "Consequently, we who overtly advocate new-covenant theology must not repeat the mistake of many in the past and turn any Confession - any Confession, even one of our own ~ into a shibboleth. If any of us should be silly enough to try to capture new covenant theology in some definitive, final statement, so that it becomes, as covenant theology has, set in concrete, then we would be working directly against the very spirit of new-covenant theology. One of its features - to my mind, its leading feature - is that it tries to come to Scripture unfiltered by any system or Confession. Every believer, in a sense, must do this for himself. To turn new-covenant theology into a system would be a contradiction in terms." (David Gay, Redemption History Through Covenants)

SRR #4 | The New Covenant Kids on the Block

We interrupt our regularly scheduled programming for an important public service announcement! Your co-hosts Tim and Carlos give their overall impressions of New Covenant Theology and Conversations from the Porch, our fellow podcasters from the Bible Thumping Wingnut Network. We also critique their views of Covenant Theology.

References

https://soundcloud.com/biblethumpingwingnut/cftp-episode-1

http://crosstocrown.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/NCT-Questions.pdf

• “A Tabular Comparison of the 1646 WCF and the 1689 LBCF,” http://www.proginosko.com/docs/wcf_lbcf.html

• Collection 10: Christian Theology, “What Do Presbyterians Believe?” by Gordon H. Clark, http://www.trinitylectures.org/MP3_downloads.php

Got questions? Comments? Feedback? You can now email us at semper.reformanda.radio@gmail.com